"It didn't hurt me": patients' and providers' perspectives on unsupervised take-home doses, drug diversion, and overdose risks in the provision of medication for opioid use disorder during COVID-19 in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinics offering medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) needed to rapidly introduce unsupervised take-home dosing, while relapsing patients and patients unable to enter treatment faced increased risks of fentanyl-related overdose deaths and other drug-related harms. Based on a qualitative study of people who inject drugs (PWID) receiving MOUD treatment and MOUD staff in Puerto Rico, this paper documents the lived experiences of patients and providers during this period and the risk perceptions and management strategies to address substance misuse and drug diversion attributable to unsupervised take-home-dose delivery. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with patients (N = 25) and staff (N = 25) in two clinics providing MOUD in San Juan, Puerto Rico, during 2022. Patients and staff were receiving or providing treatment during the pandemic, and patients reported injection drug use during the past thirty days. RESULTS: Patients were overwhelmingly male (84%), unmarried (72%), and unemployed (52%), with almost half (44%) injecting one to three times a day. Mean time in treatment was 7 years. Staff had a mean age of 46 years with more than half of the sample (63%) female. The majority of patients believed that unsupervised take-home dosing had no significant effect on their treatment adherence or engagement. In contrast, providers expressed concerns over the potential for drug diversion and possible increased risks of patient attrition, overdose episodes, and poor treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of insider perspectives on harm-reduction changes in policy implemented during a health crisis. Of note is the finding that staff disagreed among themselves regarding the potential harms of diversion and changes in drug testing protocols. These different perspectives are important to address so that future pandemic policies are successfully designed and implemented. Our study also illuminates disagreement in risk assessments between patients and providers. This suggests that preparation for emergency treatment plans requires enhanced communication with patients to match treatments to the context of lived experience.

Study to assess the impact of analytics software on operating room controlled substance management and drug diversion.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of an advanced analytics software solution in the operating room (OR) on tracking and evaluating controlled substance discrepancies. The authors hypothesized that the software would increase identification of these discrepancies and improve the efficiency of the preexisting manual process. METHODS: In this evaluation comparing data from before to after implementation of the software, data were collected using the preexisting manual process for 50 days before implementation, followed by a 25-day period for acclimation to the new software, and ending with a 49-day postimplementation review period. Data collected included the total number of medication discrepancies, time required for discrepancy review and reconciliation by an OR analyst, types of discrepancies, and number of discrepancies leading to provider audits. RESULTS: Before implementation of the analytics software, there were 7,635 OR cases with a total of 674 charting discrepancies (8.83 discrepancies per 100 total OR cases) discovered across 439 OR cases. After implementation, there were 7,454 OR cases with a total of 930 charting discrepancies (12.48 discrepancies per 100 total OR cases; P < 0.0001) discovered across 680 OR cases. While discrepancies increased by 38%, the median review time for the OR analyst per case decreased (P < 0.0001) and the percentage of incidents resolved by the OR analyst increased by 14% while the number of cases requiring additional documentation by the provider decreased by 10%. CONCLUSION: Implementation of advanced analytics software in the OR significantly increased the number of controlled substance charting discrepancies identified compared to the preimplementation review process while increasing the efficiency of the OR analyst.

Prescription Opioid Diversion Sources Among African Americans: Implications for Overdose Prevention.

Recent data show that African Americans (AAs) experienced a greater increase in overdose deaths involving prescription opioids relative to other racial/ethnic groups. One possible mechanism through which elevated risk for overdose is conferred to AAs could be due to greater exposure to contaminated counterfeit pills. Unfortunately, prescription opioid diversion is understudied among AAs and less is known regarding which sources AAs use to access pharmaceutical opioids. The objective of this study, therefore, was to identify and describe the most commonly used diversion sources for prescription opioids among AAs. Qualitative interview data are also presented to contextualize the most prevalent sources. This study used data from the Florida Minority Health Study, a mixed-methods project that included online surveys (n = 303) and qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 30) of AAs. Data collection was conducted from August 2021 to February 2022 throughout Southwest Florida. Analyses revealed that the most widely used sources for prescription opioids were dealers (33.0%) and friends/relatives (34.7%). Additionally, interview data indicated that dealers are the access point where larger volume acquisitions are made and high potency formulations are accessed. These findings suggest that AAs may utilize nonhealthcare related sources at higher rates than healthcare related sources to acquire prescription opioids. This is concerning because opioid pills acquired through nonhealthcare related sources are especially susceptible to fentanyl adulteration. These findings invite further study using nationally representative data to determine if AAs disproportionately use nonhealthcare related sources compared to persons from other racial/ethnic groups.

Prevention of drug diversion and substance use disorders among anesthesiologists: a narrative review

Abstract Diversion of substances from the care of the intended patient is a significant problem in healthcare. Patients are harmed by the undertreatment of pain and suffering, transmission of disease, as well as the risk associated with impaired vigilance. Healthcare providers may be harmed by the physical and mental impact of their addictions. Healthcare systems are placed in jeopardy by the legal impact associated with illegal routes of drug release including sanction and financial liability and loss of public trust. Healthcare institutions have implemented many measures to reduce diversion from the perioperative area. These efforts include education, medical record surveillance, automated medication dispensing systems, urine drug testing, substance waste management systems, and drug diversion prevention teams. This narrative review evaluates strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness of these systems and provides recommendations for leaders and care providers.

Preventing controlled substance diversion in perioperative settings: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Diversion of controlled substances in the perioperative setting is an ongoing challenge, with consequences for patients, anesthesiologists, perioperative staff, and health care facilities alike. Perioperative environments are at high risk for diversion, since controlled substances are frequently handled in these settings, with varying levels of oversight. In this narrative review, we summarize strategies for preventing diversion of controlled substances in perioperative settings (i.e., operating rooms, endoscopy suites, and postanesthesia recovery units). SOURCE: We performed a targeted literature search in PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Register of Controlled trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as a manual search for additional references. We used terminology related to drug diversion, drug abuse, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, physicians, operating room personnel, and controlled substances. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Many strategies have been described for preventing diversion in perioperative settings, and these are broadly categorized into: education, distribution, auditing, or provider screening. Some of these approaches may be time- and resource-intensive. There is limited evidence to inform anesthesia departments' choice of which strategies to adopt. CONCLUSION: Although awareness of perioperative controlled substance diversion has been improving, there are too few data to suggest an optimal approach. Anesthesia departments will need to work collaboratively with hospital pharmacies and actively select strategies that are reasonable given local resources.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le détournement des substances contrôlées en milieu périopératoire constitue un défi permanent qui a des conséquences pour la patientèle, les anesthésiologistes, le personnel périopératoire et les établissements de soins de santé. Les environnements périopératoires courent un risque élevé de détournement, car les substances contrôlées sont fréquemment manipulées dans ces milieux, avec divers niveaux de surveillance. Dans ce compte rendu narratif, nous résumons les stratégies de prévention du détournement des substances contrôlées dans les milieux périopératoires (c.-à-d. salles d'opération, salles d'endoscopie et salles de réveil). SOURCES: Nous avons réalisé une recherche documentaire ciblée dans les bases de données PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, le registre Cochrane des essais contrôlés et la base de données Cochrane des revues systématiques, ainsi qu'une recherche manuelle de références supplémentaires. Nous avons utilisé une terminologie liée au détournement de médicaments, à l'abus de substances, aux anesthésiologistes, aux pharmacien·nes, aux médecins, au personnel de salle d'opération et aux substances contrôlées. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: De nombreuses stratégies ont été décrites pour prévenir le détournement dans les milieux périopératoires, et celles-ci sont généralement classées en éducation, distribution, audit ou dépistage des fournisseurs et fournisseuses de soin. Certaines de ces approches peuvent exiger beaucoup de temps et de ressources. Il existe peu de données probantes pour éclairer le choix des départements d'anesthésie quant aux stratégies à adopter. CONCLUSION: Bien que la sensibilisation au détournement périopératoire de substances contrôlées se soit améliorée, il y a trop peu de données pour suggérer une approche optimale. Les départements d'anesthésie devront travailler en collaboration avec les pharmacies hospitalières et choisir activement des stratégies raisonnables qui tiennent compte des ressources locales.

Prevention of drug diversion and substance use disorders among anesthesiologists: a narrative review.

Diversion of substances from the care of the intended patient is a significant problem in healthcare. Patients are harmed by the undertreatment of pain and suffering, transmission of disease, as well as the risk associated with impaired vigilance. Healthcare providers may be harmed by the physical and mental impact of their addictions. Healthcare systems are placed in jeopardy by the legal impact associated with illegal routes of drug release including sanction and financial liability and loss of public trust. Healthcare institutions have implemented many measures to reduce diversion from the perioperative area. These efforts include education, medical record surveillance, automated medication dispensing systems, urine drug testing, substance waste management systems, and drug diversion prevention teams. This narrative review evaluates strengths, weaknesses, and effectiveness of these systems and provides recommendations for leaders and care providers.

Centralizing a controlled substance compliance and drug diversion prevention program within a multihospital health system.

PURPOSE: Challenges with monitoring and detecting drug diversion in healthcare facilities continue to be a trending topic amid the opioid epidemic. This article aims to provide insight into the expansion of an academic medical center's drug diversion and controlled substances compliance program. The justification and structure of a multihospital, centralized program are discussed. SUMMARY: Establishing dedicated controlled substances compliance and drug diversion resources has become increasingly common as awareness of the widespread healthcare impact has grown. One academic medical center recognized the value in expanding from 2 dedicated full-time equivalents (FTEs) with a scope of one facility to multiple FTEs with a scope of 5 facilities. The expansion included considering current practices at each facility, establishing the centralized team's scope, gaining organizational support, recruiting a diverse team, and forming an effective committee structure. CONCLUSION: There are multiple organizational benefits from establishing a centralized controlled substances compliance and drug diversion program, including standardization of processes, associated efficiencies, and effective risk mitigation by identifying inconsistent practices across the multifacility organization.

Signs and Behaviors to Identify Impairment and Drug Diversion.

Substance use disorder in health care professionals may adversely affect patient care. To reduce the risks of harm, raising awareness among all staff for early identification and response is a primary goal. Knowledgeable co-workers play an essential role to identify signs and behaviors indicating at-risk substance use by observed impairment or suspicion of drug diversion and report to a supervisor. Response protocol for a timely, confidential, safe and non-punitive intervention can help connect the clinician to needed assessment and treatment help and potentially save a life and provide a hopeful outcome to retain their license and career.

Uncommon and preventable: Perceptions of diversion of medication for opioid use disorder in jail.

INTRODUCTION: Correctional officials often cite diversion of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment (e.g., buprenorphine) as a reason for not offering MOUD treatment in jails and prisons, but it is poorly understood whether these fears are justified. We aimed to understand staff perceptions of medication diversion from jail-based MOUD programs and the factors that contribute to and prevent diversion. METHODS: We conducted qualitative analyses of semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus groups performed in 2019-20 with 61 administrative, security, behavioral health, and clinical staff who implement MOUD programming in seven Massachusetts jails. RESULTS: Contrary to staff expectations, buprenorphine diversion was perceived to occur infrequently during MOUD program implementation. The MOUD program changed staff views of buprenorphine, i.e., as legitimate treatment instead of as illicit contraband. Also, the program was perceived to have disrupted the illicit buprenorphine market in jail and reduced related coercion. Proactive strategies were essential to prevent and respond to buprenorphine diversion. Key components of diversion prevention strategies included: staff who distinguished among different reasons for diversion; comprehensive and routinized but flexible dosing protocols; communication, education, and monitoring; patient involvement in assessing reasons for diversion; and written policies to adjudicate diversion consequences. CONCLUSION: With appropriate protocols, buprenorphine diversion within correctional programs designed to provide MOUD treatment is perceived to be uncommon and preventable. Promising practices in program design help limit medication diversion and inform correctional officials and lawmakers as they consider whether and how to provide MOUD treatment in correctional settings.

Vulnerabilities for Drug Diversion in the Handling, Data Entry, and Verification Tasks of 2 Inpatient Hospital Pharmacies: Clinical Observations and Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Inpatient hospital pharmacies have a central role in managing controlled substances (CS) throughout the hospital medication use process (MUP). Our objectives were to identify vulnerabilities for diversion in the MUPs of 2 inpatient pharmacies, explore differences between the sites, and characterize the types of vulnerabilities identified. METHODS: We conducted clinical observations in 2 pharmacies to map their MUPs and performed a healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to proactively identify (1) the critical failure modes (CFMs) that make them vulnerable to diversion and (2) the controls that prevent, mitigate, or enhance the detectability of CFMs. RESULTS: We conducted 99 hours of observations between May-June and September-October 2018. We observed 36 pharmacy technicians, 4 pharmacists, and 1 clerk as they conducted tasks involving 4 processes common to both sites: procuring CS, receiving CS deliveries to the pharmacy, unit-dose packaging CS oral solids, and distributing CS to hospital units. The tasks and subtasks we mapped in the process flow diagrams led to the identification of 220 failure modes. Of these, 34 were deemed CFMs and were categorized as related to handling CS, data entry, or verification tasks. Three of the CFMs were unique to one site, given that the other site had a control for the CFM. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple vulnerabilities for diversion exist in inpatient pharmacy processes. Our results provide some much needed detail about how specific vulnerabilities in MUP tasks and subtasks lead to an increased risk of diversion.

Primary prevention of prescription opioid diversion: a systematic review of medication disposal interventions.

Background: In the U.S., 50-75% of nonmedical users of prescription opioids obtain their pills through diversion by friends or relatives. Increasing disposal of unused opioid prescriptions is a fundamental primary prevention strategy in combatting the opioid epidemic.Objectives: To identify interventions for disposal of unused opioid pills and assess the evidence of their effectiveness on disposal-related outcomes.Methods: A search of four electronic databases was conducted (October 2019). We included all empirical studies, systematic literature reviews, and meta-analyses about study medication disposal interventions in the U.S. Studies of disposal interventions that did not include opioids were excluded. We abstracted data for the selected articles to describe the study design, and outcomes. Further, we assessed the quality of each study using the NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools.Results: We identified 25 articles that met our inclusion criteria. None of the 13 studies on drug take-back events or the two studies on donation boxes could draw conclusions about their effectiveness. Although studies on educational interventions found positive effects on knowledge acquisition, they did not find differences in disposal rates. Two randomized controlled trials on drug disposal bags found higher opioid disposal rates in their intervention arms compared to the control arms (57.1% vs 28.6% and 33.3%, p = .01; and 85.7% vs 64.9%, p = .03).Conclusions: Peer-reviewed publications on opioid disposal interventions are limited and either do not address effectiveness or have conflicting findings. Future research should address these limitations and further evaluate implementation and cost-effectiveness.

Opioid Management in the Dying Child With Addiction.

The dramatic increases of opioid use and misuse in the past 15 years have resulted in a focus on the responsible and judicious use of opioids. In this Ethics Rounds, the commentators analyze the case of a 16-year-old girl with lymphoma and opioid misuse whose caregiver may have diverted her opioids. She is now at the end of life and prefers to die at home. The commentators, oncologists, palliative care providers, ethicists, and a medical student agree that supporting the patient's goals and practicing good opioid stewardship are not incompatible. They identify additional information that would be required to analyze the case more fully such as the nature of the evidence for misuse and diversion and whether bias inadvertently contributed to these concerns. They agree that multimodal analgesia, including but not limited to opioids, is important. Safeguards could include a contract, directly observed therapy, and/or urine drug screens. Supervision or removal of a caregiver diverting medication or admission of the patient misusing medications would be alternatives if the initial plan was unsuccessful. Such patient-centered care requires well-developed substance misuse treatment, pain management, and home hospice that are adequately reimbursed.

What Makes a National Pharmaceutical Track and Trace System Succeed? Lessons From Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Track and trace systems are increasingly being implemented as a technological solution to secure pharmaceutical supply chains. Turkey was the first country to implement a full pharmaceutical track and trace system throughout the entire regulated domestic supply chain. This article explores the emergence and functioning of this system and the consequences for substandard and falsified medicine with a focus on the underlying political and economic factors. METHODS: This study uses an explanatory case study approach that combined interviews with purposefully selected key informants and document analyses. RESULTS: The main drivers for implementing the pharmaceutical track and trace system in Turkey centered on the elimination of reimbursement fraud and the prevention of falsified medicine in the regulated supply chain. Although stakeholders experienced both physical and software-related problems in implementation, the alignment of incentives of all stakeholders with the power of the state, along with leeway for adaptations, ultimately resulted in a successful process. This track and trace system provides a clean regulated supply chain, minimizes reimbursement fraud, facilitates fast market recalls, and can flag likely medicine shortages. Staff previously engaged in pharmacy inspections now concentrate on ensuring production quality, which reduces the risk of substandard medicines. CONCLUSIONS: In Turkey, 4 factors drove the successful implementation of pharmaceutical track and trace: the political determination to eliminate reimbursement fraud, a large pharmaceutical market dominated by a single payer, medicine reimbursement being contingent on verified dispensing and prescription, and flexibility to adapt the system according to the needs of stakeholders during implementation.

In our war against the opioid epidemic, could 'weed' be a winner?

INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic has resulted in the deaths of millions of Americans and was declared a public health emergency in 2017. In response, many states have enacted policies and analyzed various interventions for harm reduction and overdose prevention, which have embraced limited success. With more states legalizing medical marijuana, another intervention of interest in pain management, much research has since focused on the potential for medical marijuana laws (MMLs) to curb the opioid epidemic. Nonetheless, marijuana legalization and its use for medical purposes has been a polarizing debate from ethical, social, and clinical perspectives. AREAS COVERED: We examine evidence on the merits of medical marijuana to address its potential as a diversion from prescription painkillers. Additionally, we review the impact of MMLs on opioid-related outcomes. Furthermore, we provide multi-layered recommendations for future directions in the evaluation of medical marijuana and MMLs as potential mitigators of the opioid epidemic. EXPERT OPINION: Despite limited and mixed evidence of efficacy, medical marijuana may still play an important role in addressing the opioid epidemic in the United States. Furthermore, we believe coordinated responses among the federal government, states, researchers, and patients are crucial in producing more robust evaluations of medical marijuana and MMLs.

Buyback Program of Unused Prescription Opioids in US Rural Communities, 2017-2018.

Objective. To implement an opioid buyback program after ambulatory surgery.Methods. We performed a prospective cohort study of 578 opioid-naïve patients prescribed opioids after ambulatory surgery at a rural US Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital from 2017 to 2018. We reimbursed $5 per unused opioid pill ($50 limit) returned to our VA for proper disposal. We tracked the number of participants, number of unused opioid pills returned, surgeon prescribing, and refill requests.Results. Out of 578 eligible patients, 171 (29.6%) returned 2136.5 unused opioid pills. Information shared with surgeons after 6 months led to a 27% decrease in opioid prescribing without an increase in refills.Conclusions. With this opioid buyback program, rural patients had a safe and convenient place to dispose of unused opioids. Surgeons used information about returns to adjust opioid prescribing after common ambulatory surgeries without an increase in refill requests.Public Health Implications. Although providers prescribe within state opioid guidelines, there will be variations in patient use after ambulatory surgery. An opioid buyback program helped our patients and surgeons decrease unused prescription opioids available for diversion in our rural communities.

Drug Diversion: Best Practices and Support for a Staff Assessment Process.

The characteristics of opioid prescribing and administration in cancer centers include large quantities and less restrictive regulatory mandates governing cancer-related pain, which may increase the risk of drug diversion by staff members. The purpose of this article is to provide a framework for creating respectful investigative processes for staff suspected of drug diversion. Organizations, including cancer centers, need to engage in careful oversight of potential drug diversions while simultaneously promoting a psychologically safe work environment for individuals to successfully seek help.